Low light performance on the 6D is likely to be better than the 90D. It very much comes down to what you need from a camera. Video and sports/wildlife photography where long lenses and high shooting speeds are useful favour the 90D. For landscape and portrait work, etc the 6D MK2 may be a better choice.
Capture Memories wrote: Hello, I have budgeted $2600 to upgrade from my 5D MKii. I am looking at 6D MKii and 1Dx used body. I am looking for low light high ISO performance. Would like to hear from 1Dx user comments on high ISO performance compares to 6D. Thank you in advance for your input. Capture Memories. 1Dx is a waste of money if all you
Canon EOS RP vs. Canon EOS R vs. Canon 6D Mark II. Side by side. 3 cameras compared. ADD CAMERA Canon EOS RP. Canon EOS R. Canon EOS 6D Mark II. move left: move
In comparison, the EOS 6D Mark II performed better in the same situation. That said, image quality is still pretty darn good and shooting with the EOS R6 is an absolute pleasure.
The 6D has better high ISO image quality, but these two cameras are very similar in regards to image quality. I feel that the 5D Mark III remains a solid upgrade from the 6D, but the 6D has some features that will make it the right choice for many - especially the price feature. Below is my attempt at a comprehensive list of the substantive
B93OU. 1c4w3iwuzc.pages.dev/3931c4w3iwuzc.pages.dev/1001c4w3iwuzc.pages.dev/2471c4w3iwuzc.pages.dev/2641c4w3iwuzc.pages.dev/2441c4w3iwuzc.pages.dev/4421c4w3iwuzc.pages.dev/2401c4w3iwuzc.pages.dev/187
canon 6d mark ii vs 6d image quality
